In the grand tradition of cybersecurity, where we tackle today’s threats with yesterday’s solutions, Kerberoasting remains the elegant elephant in every network’s room. For over a decade, experts have engaged in intense debates, from hacker forums to boardrooms, discussing and occasionally solving the perplexing puzzle of why this glorious attack remains more evasive than office WiFi on a Monday morning.

Rather than embracing the simple elegance of cryptanalysis, companies have responded with a patchwork of brittle heuristics and static rules. Indeed, it’s like using a rusty abacus to calculate Bitcoin trends. These ingenious ‘solutions’ are known for generating the richest tapestry of false positives since Y2K. If real attacks are ninja-like in their ‘low-and-slow’ operations, then our defenses are an enthusiastic brass band — loud, inaccurate, and somehow always just missing the parade.

One might reasonably ask, in the spirit of innovation and perhaps desperation, if there is a revolutionary approach to these elusive attacks? Perhaps pattern recognition technology borrowed from cats catching laser pointers, or AI systems trained on the average teenager’s ability to detect a parent hiding cookies. But alas, while everyone waits for such miracles, the art of Kerberoasting lives on, alongside fanny packs and disco — an iconic testament to cyber defense’s love of nostalgia.